|
|
 |

2002 SOT
Meeting held March 18-21, 2002 in
Nashville, TN

NOAEL/LOAEL and Benchmark Dose
Approaches to Setting Acceptable Human Exposure Levels to
1,2-Dichloroethane (Ethylene Dichloride)
D.A. Beblo1 and P. McGinnis2
Syracuse
Research Corporation. 1North Syracuse, NY; 2Philadelphia,
PA.
Abstract
Chemical risk assessment approaches other than the most common NOAEL/LOAEL
approach are being considered by the EPA. The benchmark dose (BMD)
approach has a number of advantages to the traditional NOAEL/LOAEL
approach, including not being limited to the experimental doses, and
responding to sample size and the associated uncertainty. Because EPA's
IRIS database contains no reference dose for chronic oral exposure (RfD)
for 1,2-dichloroethane, multiple approaches were compared for derivation
of a provisional toxicity value. The majority of 1,2-dichloroethane
released into the environment enters the atmosphere from its production
and use as a chemical intermediate, solvent, and use as a lead scavenger
in gasoline. Major human exposure is from urban air, drinking water from
contaminated aquifers and occupational atmospheres. Animal studies point
to the kidney and liver as target organs for 1,2-dichloroethane
toxicity, consistent with reported injury to these organs in humans
following accidental acute ingestion. The principal study selected as
the basis for RfD derivation was conducted in rats and used five
concentrations in drinking water, ranging from 500-8000 ppm, and a
vehicle control. The lowest exposure level was considered a minimal
LOAEL for increased kidney weight. Because the principal study examined
a sufficient number of exposure levels, an RfD was also calculated using
a BMD approach. RfD comparisons were based on several endpoints
including increased kidney and liver weights, renal and liver
histopathology, and altered enzyme activities.

Oral Slope Factor for Butyl Benzyl
Phthalate (BBP):
Comparison of a Linear and a Nonlinear Approach
M.H. Follansbee and M. Odin
Syracuse Research Corporation, North
Syracuse, NY.
Sponsor: Patricia McGinnis
Abstract
A review of the available carcinogenicity data for BBP (CASRN 85-68-7)
identified the chemical as a candidate for analysis of carcinogenic risk
by both the traditional linear method as well as the proposed nonlinear
(margin of exposure) method. Currently, BBP is classified as Group C
(Possible Human Carcinogen) based on no human data and limited animal
data. The basis for this classification is a 1982 NTP study wherein a
statistically significant increase in mononuclear cell leukemia was
reported in female rats following two years of exposure to 12,000 ppm of
BBP in the feed. A quantitative estimate of carcinogenic risk from oral
exposure is not currently included on IRIS due to the qualitative
weakness of the response, including similar pathologies in the control
and treated groups and lack of reduction in time to first tumor. More
recently, NTP conducted additional long-term feeding studies with BBP in
F344 rats. The results of these studies provided some evidence of an
increase in the incidence of pancreatic cancer in male F344 rats, though
a significant increase was only seen at the highest exposure level
(12,000 ppm). Concurrent with these neoplastic lesions, the study
reported a dose-dependent increase in preneoplastic lesions (acinar
hyperplasia) in the pancreas. The mode(s) of action of BBP-induced
carcinogenesis are not clear. There is limited evidence supporting both
genotoxic and non-genotoxic mechanisms. The majority of data from
genotoxicity testing have indicated that BBP is not strongly genotoxic.
Moreover, BBP, like other phthalate diesters, induces peroxisome
proliferation, which is the putative mechanism of action for the
observed changes in the pancreas. A comparison of the results using the
default linear approach and a nonlinear (margin of exposure) approach
provides insight into the effect of linearity assumptions in deriving of
quantitative estimates of oral carcinogenic risk for BBP.

Proposed Oral Slope Factor
for p-Chloroaniline Utilizing Linear
and Non-Linear Approaches
M.E. Fransen and M. Odin. Sponsor: G. Diamond
Syracuse
Research Corporation, North Syracuse, NY.
Abstract
A review of the available carcinogenicity data for p-chloroaniline
identified the chemical as a candidate for analysis of carcinogenic risk
by both the traditional linear method as well as the proposed nonlinear
(margin of exposure) method. Although no human carcinogenicity data are
available, published chronic oral studies in rats and mice provide
evidence of multi-organ carcinogenicity. The cancer risk assessment for
p-chloroaniline is complicated by species differences in target organ
susceptibility and uncertainty as to which of the compound's possible
carcinogenic mechanisms is most relevant to humans. There is evidence
for genotoxic and non-genotoxic modes of action, both of which
apparently require bioactivation of p-chloroaniline. The primary tumor
types observed in the oral studies are rare splenic tumors (fibrosarcoma,
osteosarcoma, or hemangiosarcoma) and adrenal medullary
pheochromocytomas in male rats, and hepatocellular carcinomas in male
mice. Data on tissue-specific distributions of reductase activities,
which protect against the reactive intermediates of p-chloroaniline,
suggest that the mouse hepatocellular tumors may not be relevant to
humans. However, either of the rat tumors could be relevant to humans:
the adrenal tumors induced by a genotoxic mechanism, and the splenic
tumors induced by a non-genotoxic mechanism secondary to erythrocyte
toxicity. Dose-response modeling of the incidence data for rat tumors
was performed using both linear and non-linear methods. In deriving oral
slope factors based on rat adrenal and splenic tumors, the default
approach assuming linearity was compared with the margin of exposure
approach, which assumes nonlinearity. The margin of exposure approach
for splenic sarcomas was based on the assumption that an oral dose of p-chloroaniline
that was protective for splenic fibrosis (a non-neoplastic lesion) would
also be protective for carcinogenicity in the spleen.

Refinement of Reference
Dose (RfD) for Zinc
L. Ingerman1, H. Choudhury2, M. Osier1
1Syracuse Research Corp., Syracuse, NY, 2Natl.
Center for
Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development,
U.S. EPA, Cincinnati OH.
Abstract
U.S. EPA is currently re-evaluating the RfD for zinc. Derivation of an
RfD for zinc requires balancing its essentialty functions with its
potential adverse effects. Essential trace elements, such as zinc, pose
an additional problem of nutrient-nutrient interactions. The excessive
intake of one nutrient may interfere with the toxicokinetic properties
of another nutrient. Increased zinc intake has been associated with a
number of adverse health effects in humans, including decreased
erythrocyte Cu-Zn superoxide dismutase (ESOD) activity, hematological
effects, decreases in HDL-cholesterol levels, and gastrointestinal
effects. Human studies provide evidence that excessive zinc intake may
primarily induce copper deficiency. Excessive dietary zinc results in
the induction of intestinal metallothionein synthesis. Since
metallothionein has a greater binding capacity for copper than for zinc,
copper absorbed into the intestinal mucosal cells is sequestered by
metallothionein and does not enter the body. Copper deficiency is the
primary mechanism for a number of the effects associated with excessive
zinc intake, including decreases in HDL-cholesterol levels and ESOD
activity. The endpoints associated with copper deficiency appear to be
the most sensitive targets of toxicity (occur at doses of Zn as low as
300 ppm). There are limited data to suggest that high zinc intake can
decrease iron absorption leading to symptoms of iron deficiency. In
deriving an RfD for zinc, these interactions, as well as others, must be
considered to determine a level of zinc (4-40 mg/day) that would not
result in a disturbance in the balance of other nutrients. (This
abstract does not necessarily reflect U.S. EPA policy).

Updated Assessment of Health Effects from Toluene Exposure
P. McClure1, M. Osier1, and L. Flowers2
1Syracuse Research Corp., North Syracuse, NY; 2National
Center for Environmental Assessment, U.S. EPA, Washington, DC.
Abstract
Toluene is widely used in industry as a solvent, gasoline additive, and
in polymer production. The present EPA assessments for toluene on IRIS
were verified between 1987 and 1990. Since the verification dates, a
number of new studies have been published, warranting a reconsideration
of the data for toluene. The existing IRIS RfD is based on hepatic
effects in rats exposed by gavage. New oral studies not described on
IRIS examined hepatic, immunological, and neurological endpoints, and
raise the issue of whether or not to change the critical effect for RfD
derivation from hepatic effects to one based on immunological or
neurological endpoints. The existing RfC is based on a LOAEL for
neurobehavioral effects in a study of toluene-exposed electronics
workers, but a number of new studies examining neurologic effects in
occupationally-exposed humans have been published, including two
identifying NOAELs. The new studies support neurological effects as the
critical effect for RfC derivation and add more information about
exposure-response relationships. Several methods of analysis, including
NOAEL/LOAEL and benchmark dose analyses, are under consideration with
regard to the derivation of a new RfC. New data are also available
examining the potential carcinogenic effects of toluene. While a single
oral study in rats has suggested carcinogenic effects of toluene,
limited reporting of the study results confounds interpretation.
Adequate inhalation bioassays in rats and mice have not demonstrated a
carcinogenic effect of toluene, and the vast majority of genotoxicity
evaluations of toluene have been negative. (This document does not
necessarily reflect EPA policy.)

Chronic
Risk Assessment for Tributyl Phosphate
(CAS NO. 126-73-8)
A.R. McDonald1, M. Odin1 and H. Choudhury2
1 Syracuse Research Corporation, North Syracuse, NY;
2National
Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and development,
U.S. EPA, Cincinnati, OH.
Abstract
Tributyl phosphate (TBP) is a non-flammable, non-explosive liquid that
is used as a solvent or an anti-foaming agent. Dietary exposure to
tributyl phosphate at high doses produces a reversible hyperplasia of
the urinary bladder epithelium which is not due to the presence of
crystalluria, urinary precipitates or calculi, but may possibly be
attributed to the presence of a toxic metabolite(s), tertiary butyl
alcohol and or dibutyl hydrogen phosphate. A 2-year study of rats and
mice identified both a NOAEL and LOAEL for bladder hyperplasia in rats,
and was selected as the key study for the derivation of the provisional
RfD. Mice did not show significant dose-response in any of the target
organs examined in this 2-year chronic study. The 2-year rat study
reported a significant increase of urinary bladder papillomas and
carcinomas in males and urinary bladder papillomas in females, but only
in animals exposed to the highest level of TBP in their diet. There is
no clear evidence for the mode(s) of action for tributyl
phosphate-induced urinary bladder tumors in rats. The vast majority of
in
vitro and in vivo tests indicate that tributyl phosphate is
negative for genotoxicity. The apparent lack of genotoxic effects,
coupled with low-dose hyperplasia and high-dose tumor formation, is
suggestive of a non-genotoxic mechanism of carcinogenesis. Therefore,
several different approaches were used when calculating a quantitative
estimate of carcinogenic risk. Provisional oral slope factors were
derived using both a linearized multistage model and a margin of
exposure analysis, and the results produced by the different methods
were compared. (This abstract does not necessarily reflect EPA policy).

Re-evaluation
of the Oral Reference Doses for the Brominated Trihalomethanes
Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, and Bromoform
L.H. Moilanen1, B.C. Allen2 and N.H. Chiu3
1Syracuse Research Corporation, Denver, CO; 2K
S Crump Group, ICF Consulting, Inc., Chapel Hill, NC; 3U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Health and Ecological Criteria
Division, Office of Science and Technology, Washington, D.C.
Abstract
The brominated trihalomethanes (BTHMs) bromodichloromethane (BDCM),
dibromochloromethane (DBCM), and bromoform are by-products of drinking
water chlorination. Information on the hazard, dose-response, and risk
characterization of these chemicals is being updated. Oral Reference
Doses (RfDs) for BDCM, DBCM, and bromoform have previously been derived
using the conventional NOAEL/LOAEL approach and are reported in the
Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). The RfDs obtained were 0.02
mg/kg-day for BDCM, based on lesions in the liver, kidney, and thyroid
of exposed mice; 0.02 mg/kg-day for DBCM, based on absence of lesions in
exposed rats; and 0.02 mg/kg-day for bromoform, based on absence of
effects in exposed rats. For the updating process, new health effects
data published between 1993 and July, 2001 were identified and
evaluated. Toxicological endpoints from new and existing studies were
reviewed for suitability for benchmark dose modeling. Benchmark doses (BMDs)
for selected endpoints were obtained using the Benchmark Dose Modeling
Software (Version 1.2) developed by the U.S. EPA National Center for
Environmental Assessment. BMDL<sub>10</sub> values (the 95% lower
confidence limit on the BMD) were used to calculate a new RfD for each
BTHM. The uncertainty factors used in derivation of the RfD values were
also re-evaluated in consideration of new studies added to the databases
for individual BTHMs. Using this approach, the resulting RfD values are
0.003 mg/kg-day for BDCM, based on fatty degeneration in the liver of
rats; 0.02 mg/kg-day for DBCM, based on fatty changes in the liver of
rats; and 0.009 for bromoform, based on hepatocellular vacuolization in
the liver of rats. (This work was conducted under contract to EPA, but
the opinions expressed in this abstract are those of the authors and do
not necessarily represent EPA policy.)

The Oral
Reference Dose for Ethylene Dibromide:
A New Look at an Old Problem
M. Osier1, M. Odin1, C. Smallwood2,
and J. Swartout2
1Syracuse Research Corporation, North Syracuse NY; 2U.S.
EPA, NCEA, Cincinnati, OH.
Abstract
Previous evaluations of the experimental toxicity data for ethylene
dibromide (EDBr) have concluded that limitations of the available
studies precluded the derivation of oral toxicity values. Therefore, the
the U.S. EPA has no oral RfD on IRIS and ATSDR has not developed an MRL
for EDBr. Upon critical re-examination of the data, however, with
consideration of the strengths and limitations of the existing studies,
as well as a proposed mechanism of action for the testicular effects of
EDBr, a provisional oral RfD for EDBr of 9x10<sup>-3</sup> mg/kg-day is
presented here. A lifetime carcinogenicity study in rats and mice was
performed by the NCI, but was terminated prematurely because the MTD was
apparently being exceeded. Even with early termination, dose-related
increases in testicular atrophy were noted histologically, as well as
increased incidence of tumors of the tunica vaginalis (the serous
covering of the testes). Several studies in bulls exposed orally to low
doses of EDBr also showed testicular atrophy, which was reversible upon
cessation of exposure. Rodent studies of 90 days and 17 months have also
examined the oral toxicity of EDBr. The provisional RfD is based on
testicular atrophy in rats observed in the NCI study rather than on the
effects observed in bulls at lower doses. The rationale for the choice
of critical study includes an allometric argument as well as a
mechanistic one. |